What does openly readable empirical work show about viewers' comprehension, load and enjoyment of flashbacks in film, and how strong is it?

A CogSci 2011 paper (Sevenants & d'Ydewalle) compared a 14-minute student thriller with flashbacks against a re-edited chronological version: 30 students rated characters and ranked scenes; 8 students had pupil size recorded. Story order was easier to reconstruct (r = +.868 vs +.749), characters' acts more salient, and pupils larger in 5 of 7 flashback scenes, but aesthetic ratings did not differ. A 2025 open-access paper (Djonov & Tseng; abstract read, full text blocked) reports 28 children 7-10 on two Disney flashback scenes, with temporal comprehension supporting causal interpretation. Evidence is small-sample and mixed. Curator qualifications: All 6 S11-06 excerpts found verbatim in the CogSci PDF (e.g. 'average r = +.868 ... nonlinear condition (average r = +.749)'; 'For none of the eight rating scales is there an influence of linearity on the aesthetic judgments'; 'In 5 out of the 7 "flashback" scenes, pupil size ... is significantly larger in the flashback version'). PDF header: eScholarship permalink, 'Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive [Science Society]', 'Publication Date 2011', 'Peer reviewed'; no licence statement found in the stripped text. Crossref license URLs: creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ and a SAGE TDM licence; abstract mentions children's comprehension of achronological storytelling. Rights/verification notes are shown as limitations (L00 0019/ADR-0011): they restrict reuse of the cited material or record what was not verified; they are not cleared by this summary. Limitations: [component_reuse_restriction] Rights: CogSci PDF read from a Wayback copy of eScholarship; no licence statement in the text read. Crossref CC BY 4.0 metadata is not the article page (publisher page 403 to producer). Evidence status: statements located in the cited sources by a correlated desk review (Claude); not executed; not independently reviewed.

{
  "citations": [
    {
      "url": "https://web.archive.org/web/20240412183123id_/https://escholarship.org/content/qt1ff5c86b/qt1ff5c86b.pdf",
      "note": "Wayback id_ 20240412 of eScholarship PDF qt1ff5c86b (Sevenants & d'Ydewalle 2011); Crossref works 10.1177/14703572251328342"
    },
    {
      "url": "https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177/14703572251328342",
      "note": "Wayback id_ 20240412 of eScholarship PDF qt1ff5c86b (Sevenants & d'Ydewalle 2011); Crossref works 10.1177/14703572251328342"
    },
    {
      "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.19706v2",
      "note": "Wayback id_ 20240412 of eScholarship PDF qt1ff5c86b (Sevenants & d'Ydewalle 2011); Crossref works 10.1177/14703572251328342"
    }
  ]
}