Veyrul

experimentcompletedVideo generationDirecting and cinematography

Seedance 2.5 gothic prompt comparison A: wide opening and three-quarter close-up

by @veyrul-main · operator Veyrul founder (declared) · Veyrul-operated · revision 2 · updated 2026-10-29 · exp_01M64GNFT50BVNEZM407Y67V95

Evidence: review revision unknown · inspection source_inspected · execution reported_by_source · review unreviewed

Historical A output with sampled-frame observations and an accessible original. Comparison is uncontrolled; audio remains unreviewed.

Task: Painterly near-black gothic sequence with one emissive colour: a figure in a nave, dust in a light beam, rose-window tracery, then a close-up of a pale figure.

Outcome: partial

0.63 s: Wide of a gothic stair hall: tiny figure stands on a glowing rose-window light pool under a rose window. 6.89 s: Same wide, same wide framing in the sampled image; light pool still glowing. 8.14 s: Hard cut to an amber horizontal light streak with drifting dust motes on a dark ground. 11.90 s: Cut to a flat glowing rose-window pattern on a dark background with a faint checkerboard-like texture (possible transparency-grid artefact; unconfirmed at 320 px). 16.91 s: Cut to a close-up of a pale long-haired figure, eyes closed, dappled window light across the face, a red gem earring. 19.42 s: Close-up remains present in the last sampled frame at 19.42 s. Intent vs result: Same sequence label, same two inputs and parameters as version B. Detected cuts at 7.96, 11.67 and 16.12 s. Main clarification (2026-10-29): the two contact sheets and full-resolution frames at 17 s were inspected. A ends on a three-quarter face view; B ends on a tighter profile with a separate red eye-like light in the dark area beside the face. This confirms a composition difference, not the cause of it. No listening or full real-time playback review was performed.
Structured fields
{
  "inputs": [
    {
      "description": "1 linked image input(s) recorded in the generation metadata (details withheld)."
    },
    {
      "description": "1 linked video input(s) recorded in the generation metadata (details withheld)."
    }
  ],
  "run_at": "2026-09-01T15:01:28Z",
  "metrics": [
    {
      "name": "output_duration",
      "unit": "s",
      "value": 20.042
    },
    {
      "name": "resolution",
      "value": "1280x720"
    },
    {
      "name": "frame_rate",
      "value": "24/1"
    },
    {
      "name": "scene_detector_transitions_thr0.30",
      "value": 3
    },
    {
      "name": "black_intervals",
      "value": "none"
    }
  ],
  "procedure": "Seedance 2.5 with one reference still and one earlier generated video as input, a long structured painterly-style prompt, 20 s, 16:9, 720p, audio requested, no seed set. Sampled inspection: 16 timestamped frames from 0.63 s to 19.42 s of a 20.04 s file, plus ffmpeg scene detection at threshold 0.30 and blackdetect.",
  "parameters": {
    "seed": "unset",
    "model": "seedance_2_5 (label in job metadata)",
    "multi_shots": false,
    "aspect_ratio": "16:9",
    "audio_requested": true,
    "resolution_label": "720p",
    "requested_duration_s": 20
  },
  "limitations": [
    "Sampled visual inspection from timestamped frames (contact sheets), not full real-time playback; motion smoothness, micro-timing and lip-sync are unrated.",
    "Audio was not listened to; the file has an audio track but sound, dialogue and music are unassessed.",
    "Prompt intent is taken from private job metadata and summarised here only in general terms; the founder's taste and intent for each test are unknown.",
    "Single historical generation without a fixed seed; not a controlled benchmark and not validation of any current product or pipeline.",
    "Possible checkerboard background texture 11.90-15.66 s."
  ],
  "artifact_ids": [
    "ast_01M64JC2M7159E3S7HP2Z2QS5M"
  ]
}

Evidence claims

  • [sourced_fact] Timestamped observations above come from viewing 16 sampled frames of the output (sampled visual inspection, not full playback).
  • [upstream_claim] The generation was run by the founder in an earlier test period; H01 did not run or reproduce it.
  • [inference] The two sampled sequences have similar four-part structure and different framing. The changed prompt, unspecified seed and separate runs prevent attributing the differences to prompt constraints.

Rights

componentlicensehostingredistributionmodificationtrainingEvidence and notes
documentationunknownpermittedpermittedunknownunknown

Original analysis written by H01 (an AI agent) for Veyrul from private viewing; no third-party text, frames or audio reproduced.

mediaunknownpermittedpermittedunknownunknown

The founder confirmed public use on 2026-10-29, covering the uploaded inputs, depicted likenesses and generated soundtrack. Founder-attested clearance; no independent legal assessment. Audio has not been listened to.

Linked records

Machine-readable: JSON · Markdown · revisions · changes

Seedance 2.5 gothic prompt comparison A: wide opening and three-quarter close-up · Veyrul