CORRECTION to C3-B054-G19-07: which parts of the sound-planning candidate are in its cited pages (Haunting about 100 sounds and two months; Matrix concept from the finished script; Welles memo) and which are not (Thom 2000 questions; late hiring and composer coordination)?

Problem. C3-B054-G19-07 lists four planning artefacts and says sound people are 'typically brought on late', spotting is squeezed and composer and sound crew 'rarely coordinate', as 'Weis reports'. Audit result (cited pages re-fetched and searched whole-document). (a) Supported: The Haunting article says Rydstrom had two months to prepare, 'an unusually long time', against sound being viewed as the last and hastiest element; De Bont operated a digital audio player and used about 100 of Rydstrom's sounds on set to inspire and surprise the actors. (a) The Matrix interview: Davis says the Wachowskis had a finished script which they read and 'we developed an overall concept for its sound design'. (a) Welles's sound memo to Murch separates realistic 'background music' from sparingly used 'underscoring'; the page dates it 1958 (the original said 1957-58). (c)/(d) Not supported by the cited pages: the Thom (2000) script-reading questions (no Thom article is among the cited URLs; 'Thom' appears only in site navigation), the statements that spotting is squeezed and that composer and sound crew rarely coordinate, and the attribution to Weis. The nearest cited support for the 'late' claim is the single phrase in The Haunting article, which is one journalist's remark, not a survey. Method. Keep the three supported artefacts, attribute the 'late hiring' remark only to the Haunting article, and drop or re-source the Thom and Weis parts. Limitations. Each artefact is one film's anecdote (1958, 1999); none is a measured practice. Version/date. Re-fetched 2026-10-23. Curator qualifications: All cited documentation excerpts located on the live pages by curator GET; no video sources. Correction of earlier record(s) C3-B054-G19-07 from a discovery re-fetch on 2026-10-23; the curator re-located the cited excerpts by GET. Limitations: Absence claims cover the four cited URLs only. The Thom article and a Weis source may exist elsewhere on FilmSound or in print. Classification: (a) for Haunting, Matrix and Welles memo; (c) for the late-hiring remark (one phrase, not a survey); (d) for the Thom 2000 questions and Weis attribution. Evidence status: statements located in the cited sources by a correlated desk review (Claude); not executed; not independently reviewed.

{
  "citations": [
    {
      "url": "https://www.filmsound.org/articles/haunting/haunting.htm",
      "note": "interview, opening; interview, filming section; first answer; Welles memo quotation"
    },
    {
      "url": "https://www.filmsound.org/editorsnet/matrix1.htm",
      "note": "interview, opening; interview, filming section; first answer; Welles memo quotation"
    },
    {
      "url": "https://www.filmsound.org/murch/evil",
      "note": "cited at https://www.filmsound.org/murch/evil/; interview, opening; interview, filming section; first answer; Welles memo quotation"
    },
    {
      "url": "https://www.filmsound.org/murch/evil/",
      "note": "observed URL (dated/alias form of the cited catalogue source; canonical identity retained)"
    }
  ]
}