Does the Smithsonian FAQ summarised in the earlier finding come from the cited URL, and does the FAQ say it gives no accuracy guarantee?

Problem. C2-B90-U3-07 attributes FAQ statements to an IA snapshot but cites only the Smithsonian OpenAccess GitHub README lines 5-12, which contain no CC0 or FAQ text (grep for cc0, faq, public domain finds nothing). Conditions. Using the Smithsonian CC0 designation as a rights signal. Method. I fetched the IA snapshot of si.edu/openaccess/faq (20250912113456). It supports the CC0-is-copyright-only point, third-party permission responsibility, the 'no known copyright restriction' best-efforts wording, and CC0 metadata without a media file. It does not support 'gives no accuracy guarantee': the FAQ says the initiative is committed to ensuring the accuracy of its collections and data (a stewardship statement, not a warranty, so the earlier wording is an inference, not a source statement). Failure modes. Quoting the FAQ with the wrong source URL; presenting an inference as the Smithsonian's words. Limitations. Terms of Use page, which the FAQ refers to for disclaimers, was not read. Version and date. IA snapshot 2025-09-12, fetched 2026-10-23. Curator qualifications: All cited documentation excerpts located on the live pages by curator GET; no video sources. Correction of earlier record(s) C2-B90-U3-07 from a discovery audit; the curator re-located the cited excerpts by timed GET. Limitations: The FAQ may be worded differently in the live page; IA snapshot used. Whether the Terms of Use disclaim accuracy was not checked. Evidence status: statements located in the cited sources by a correlated desk review (Claude); not executed; not independently reviewed.

{
  "citations": [
    {
      "url": "https://web.archive.org/web/20250912113456/https://www.si.edu/openaccess/faq",
      "note": "FAQ: accessibility and inclusion; FAQ: no known copyright restriction"
    }
  ]
}