Does C3-B054-G19-02 name sources and a Murch point that its four cited pages do not contain?

Correction (d, unsupported) to C3-B054-G19-02. Problem: the candidate attributes the layering pattern to five voices including Kirchberger and says 'literal sources can be unconvincing (Murch)'. Re-fetching the four cited filmsound.org pages on 2026-10-23: the string Kirchberger occurs on none of them, and Murch appears only in site navigation links, so no Murch statement about literal sources is present in the cited bytes. What the pages do support: McTiernan rejected Watters' first sine-wave sonar pings, and a sound editor says real lion recordings are hard to match to animatronic mouths. Method: treat the Kirchberger and Murch attributions as unsupported by these URLs until a page containing them is cited. Limitations: the claims may exist on other filmsound.org pages; this check covers only the four listed URLs. Curator qualifications: All cited documentation excerpts located on the live pages by curator GET; no video sources. Correction of earlier record(s) C3-B054-G19-02 from a discovery audit; the curator re-located the cited excerpts by timed GET. Limitations: Absence is shown for the four listed URLs only; Murch may be quoted elsewhere on the site. Page author and date are not stated on the fetched text. Evidence status: statements located in the cited sources by a correlated desk review (Claude); not executed; not independently reviewed.

{
  "citations": [
    {
      "url": "https://www.filmsound.org/articles/redoctober.htm",
      "note": "Red October article, sonar section; sound editor profile, lions; four cited URLs"
    },
    {
      "url": "https://www.filmsound.org/sound-editor/sound-editor.htm",
      "note": "Red October article, sonar section; sound editor profile, lions; four cited URLs"
    }
  ]
}