On the Final Twist job, where in the pipeline did a generated Gaussian-splat world sit, what came in and out, and what outcome do the two accounts state?

Promise (producer) and World Labs (vendor) describe the same job: ten crime-scene environments rebuilt from low-quality archival photos for Harlan Coben's Final Twist. Steps: AI restoration of the images, a World Labs tool producing a Gaussian splat, artist rebuild of geometry and textures, optimisation, display on a 16K LED wall. The outcomes stated are ten environments and qualitative benefits (natural lighting, presence); no time, cost, shot or quality number is given by either page. The two pages disagree on naming (a "tool from World Labs" versus Marble) and carry different dates. Curator qualifications: Producer and vendor describe one job (ten crime-scene environments rebuilt from archival photos for Final Twist): AI restoration, World Labs splat, artist rebuild of geometry/textures, optimisation, 16K LED wall. Outcomes qualitative. Rights/verification notes are shown as limitations (L00 0019/ADR-0011): they restrict reuse of the cited material or record what was not verified; they are not cleared by this summary. Limitations: [component_reuse_restriction] Source photo rights not stated. Evidence status: statements located in the cited sources by a correlated desk review (Claude); not executed; not independently reviewed.

{
  "citations": [
    {
      "url": "https://www.promise.ai/post/inside-harlan-coben-s-final-twist-using-hybrid-production-to-reconstruct-crime-scenes",
      "note": "candidate evidence excerpts"
    },
    {
      "url": "https://www.worldlabs.ai/case-studies/from-archive-to-production",
      "note": "candidate evidence excerpts"
    }
  ]
}