Can coincidence start a plot's trouble but not end it, where does that rule come from, and what do older sources say about where in the outline a coincidence may sit?
The rule appears in two forms in openly readable material. (1) Directional: Mackendrick's 'Slogans for the Screenwriter's Wall' (undated page, (c) Mackendrick Family Trust): 'Use coincidence to get characters into trouble, not out of trouble'; the Pixar list item #19 attributed to Emma Coats appears in a blog post of 11 June 2012 (secondary). (2) Earlier, differently shaped rules: Phillips (1914) names the coincidence that 'helps the author and hero out' (treasure, rescue party) and 'a termination by an act of God' as the failure; Archer (1912) ties acceptability to importance, not direction: coincidences 'become the more improbable in the direct ratio of their importance' and one 'which coincides with a crisis' is 'wholly inacceptable in serious art'. I did not find an earlier openly readable statement of the directional wording; that is a bounded negative (see negative_results). For an outline check the sources support three separate tests: direction (does it hurt or help the prot...
Structured fields
{
"citations": [
{
"url": "https://thestickingplace.com/alexander-mackendrick/slogans-for-the-screenwriters-wall/",
"note": "candidate evidence excerpts"
},
{
"url": "https://www.goodreads.com/author_blog_posts/2571648-the-rules-of-storytelling-according-to-pixar",
"note": "candidate evidence excerpts"
},
{
"url": "https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/70937/pg70937.txt",
"note": "candidate evidence excerpts"
},
{
"url": "https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/10865/pg10865.txt",
"note": "candidate evidence excerpts"
}
]
}Evidence claims
- [sourced_fact] The rule appears in two forms in openly readable material. (1) Directional: Mackendrick's 'Slogans for the Screenwriter's Wall' (undated page, (c) Mackendrick Family Trust): 'Use coincidence to get characters into trouble, not out of trouble'; the Pixar list item #19 attributed to Emma Coats appears in a blog post of 11 June 2012 (secondary). (2) Earlier, differently shaped rules: Phillips (1914) names the coincidence that 'helps the author and hero out' (treasure, rescue party) and 'a termination by an act of God' as the failure; Archer (1912) ties acceptability to importance, not direction: coincidences 'become the more improbable in the direct ratio of their importance' and one 'which coincides with a crisis' is 'wholly inacceptable in serious art'. I did not find an earlier openly readable statement of the directional wording; that is a bounded negative (see negative_results). For an outline check the sources support three separate tests: direction (does it hurt or help the protagonist), position (outskirts or the thick of the action), and importance (does the outcome turn on it). · locator: candidate evidence excerpts source
Rights
| component | license | hosting | redistribution | modification | training | Evidence and notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| documentation | unknown | permitted | permitted | unknown | unknown | Applies to this original summary only, not to the cited sources. |
Linked records
- cites → https://thestickingplace.com/alexander-mackendrick/slogans-for-the-screenwriters-wall
- cites → https://www.goodreads.com/author_blog_posts/2571648-the-rules-of-storytelling-according-to-pixar
- cites → https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/10865/pg10865.txt
- cites → https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/70937/pg70937.txt