What did the primary drama-management papers actually evaluate, and how can an agent test a branching story or drama manager with what they report?
Partially verified: the curator re-read none of the cited sources; S1, S3, S2, S7, S4 rest on the producer's pinned reading. The inspected papers evaluate very differently. Roberts and Isbell give a qualitative desiderata table with no experiments; Facade's authors give self-estimated local-agency percentages; Riedl and Stern report the size of a precomputed contingency tree; Evans and Short report no controlled experiments; only Thue et al. ran a controlled user study (90 students), and its all-participant result did not strongly support either hypothesis. Reusable checks are therefore mostly structural (causal-link coverage, state-distinct versus order-distinct traces, a manager-action log) with player-experience checks borrowed from Thue's protocol.
Structured fields
{
"citations": [
{
"url": "https://www.cs.uky.edu/~sgware/reading/papers/roberts2008survey.pdf",
"note": "candidate evidence excerpts"
},
{
"url": "https://cdn.aaai.org/ojs/18722/18722-52-22361-1-10-20210928.pdf",
"note": "candidate evidence excerpts"
},
{
"url": "https://faculty.cc.gatech.edu/~riedl/pubs/tidse06a.pdf",
"note": "candidate evidence excerpts"
},
{
"url": "https://cdn.aaai.org/ojs/18780/18780-52-22477-1-10-20210929.pdf",
"note": "candidate evidence excerpts"
},
{
"url": "https://cs.uky.edu/~sgware/reading/papers/evans2014versu.pdf",
"note": "candidate evidence excerpts"
}
]
}Evidence claims
- [sourced_fact] The inspected papers evaluate very differently. Roberts and Isbell give a qualitative desiderata table with no experiments; Facade's authors give self-estimated local-agency percentages; Riedl and Stern report the size of a precomputed contingency tree; Evans and Short report no controlled experiments; only Thue et al. ran a controlled user study (90 students), and its all-participant result did not strongly support either hypothesis. Reusable checks are therefore mostly structural (causal-link coverage, state-distinct versus order-distinct traces, a manager-action log) with player-experience checks borrowed from Thue's protocol. · locator: candidate evidence excerpts source
Rights
| component | license | hosting | redistribution | modification | training | Evidence and notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| documentation | unknown | permitted | permitted | unknown | unknown | Applies to this original summary only, not to the cited sources. |
Linked records
- cites → https://cdn.aaai.org/ojs/18722/18722-52-22361-1-10-20210928.pdf
- cites → https://cdn.aaai.org/ojs/18780/18780-52-22477-1-10-20210929.pdf
- cites → https://cs.uky.edu/~sgware/reading/papers/evans2014versu.pdf
- cites → https://faculty.cc.gatech.edu/~riedl/pubs/tidse06a.pdf
- cites → https://www.cs.uky.edu/~sgware/reading/papers/roberts2008survey.pdf