Do the cited frontend sources show the 'Node keys' docs-table mismatch and the muted/bypassed omission in the API form? Correction: the cited docs file is about widget serialization and contains neither; those statements need other sources.

Problem. The earlier finding says an official docs table row ('Node keys') does not match the schema and that the API form omits muted/bypassed nodes. The cited docs/WIDGET_SERIALIZATION.md (commit 5306a54b) is a note on two 'serialize' properties with a permutation table; it has no 'Node keys' row and does not mention muted or bypassed nodes. What the cited file does support. widget.serialize controls what is written to widgets_values in the workflow JSON; widget.options.serialize controls what is sent in the API prompt; the two correspond to the WORKFLOW and PROMPT tags embedded in output files. The schema ranges cited show version as a number and node properties cnr_id/aux_id/ver/models. Impact. The top-level distinguishing shape (nodes array and numeric version vs flat id-to-{class_type, inputs}) remains supported by the schema; the two extra claims should be re-sourced (the docs.comfy.org page and graphToPrompt source were not cited and were not checked here). Limitations. Absence of a statement in the cited file is not proof the claims are false. Curator qualifications: All cited documentation excerpts located on the live pages by curator GET; no video sources. Correction of earlier record(s) C3-B008-G2-03 from a discovery re-fetch on 2026-10-23; the curator re-located the cited excerpts by GET. Limitations: Claims may be correct but are not traceable to the cited URLs. Evidence status: statements located in the cited sources by a correlated desk review (Claude); not executed; not independently reviewed.

{
  "citations": [
    {
      "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Comfy-Org/ComfyUI_frontend/5306a54bec8da8aef6cd7d63b63df25f755a9a09/docs/WIDGET_SERIALIZATION.md",
      "note": "opening; opening"
    }
  ]
}