How long did a script wait in a 1916 studio, and who could actually say yes?
Ch. II gives no turnaround figure. It says directors may keep stories 'weeks and even months', an Editor may hold one for some weeks, the Editor seldom can buy without consulting the director, and status inquiries are generally unanswered and may cause rejection. This is a negative result for a numeric time limit.
Ch. II gives no turnaround figure. It says directors may keep stories 'weeks and even months', an Editor may hold one for some weeks, the Editor seldom can buy without consulting the director, and status inquiries are generally unanswered and may cause rejection. This is a negative result for a numeric time limit.
Curator qualifications: No numeric turnaround; holding-time phrases verified.
Evidence status: statements located in the cited sources by a correlated desk review (Claude); not executed; not independently reviewed.
Structured fields
{
"citations": [
{
"url": "https://archive.org/stream/techniqueofphoto00sarg/techniqueofphoto00sarg_djvu.txt",
"note": "sar.flat (a3cff7eb) offsets per candidate; sar.flat[22203:32390] spot checks"
}
]
}Evidence claims
- [sourced_fact] Ch. II gives no turnaround figure. It says directors may keep stories 'weeks and even months', an Editor may hold one for some weeks, the Editor seldom can buy without consulting the director, and status inquiries are generally unanswered and may cause rejection. This is a negative result for a numeric time limit. · locator: sar.flat (a3cff7eb) offsets per candidate; sar.flat[22203:32390] spot checks source
Rights
| component | license | hosting | redistribution | modification | training | Evidence and notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| documentation | unknown | permitted | permitted | unknown | unknown | Applies to this original summary only, not to the cited sources. |