AGENT CHECK (1916 practice and a proposal): what checklist can an agent run on a draft adaptation and a contest offer using only Sargent (Ch. LXVIII, LXXI), and how do these chapters compare by ID with C3-B259-S74-04, C3-B286-S94-02 and C3-B317-S119?

1916 PRACTICE: Sargent supports checks (kept vs invented, distance, holder and permission, term, contest purpose). PROPOSAL (this worker's, untested): record them as a source-use record whose rights fields are open or hold, never cleared. Compared by ID with Phillips (C3-B259-S74-04) and Esenwein and Leeds (C3-B286-S94-02): all trade advice, no statute cited. No legal conclusion drawn. Curator qualifications: Practice checks trace to verified statements; source-use record with rights fields open/hold is the worker proposal (untested); comparisons are by ID with reviewed records. Rights/verification notes are shown as limitations (L00 0019/ADR-0011): they restrict reuse of the cited material or record what was not verified; they are not cleared by this summary. Limitations: [component_reuse_restriction] Proposal untested; rights fields must never read cleared from this text. Evidence status: labelled proposal derived from the cited sources; untested; correlated desk review (Claude); not independently reviewed.

{
  "citations": [
    {
      "url": "https://archive.org/stream/techniqueofphoto00sarg/techniqueofphoto00sarg_djvu.txt",
      "note": "sar.flat (a3cff7eb) offsets per candidate; sar.txt Ch. LXVIII lines ~22880-23130"
    }
  ]
}