If a pipeline ingests VES Camera Report CSV, what parsing rules does the spec give, which fields and versions are inconsistent or unfinished, and what evidence is there that vendors adopted it?
The CRIF spec gives parse rules (CSV, one row per take with slate columns repeated, SlatesUUID as dedupe key, 'Tk ' take prefix, vertical-tab multi-selects, YYYY/MM/DD timestamps, SLATE-CAMERALETTER file names). It also has unfinished or inconsistent parts: footer 'v0.9c 9/25/2013' versus table 'Version 1.1', a 'Start Height' help text on the End field, mixed feet/inches strings under a numeric-only rule, a TODO on Tk Clip Num, provisional stereo fields. Adoption evidence is vendor pledges (press release, 2013) and two listed integrations; no later adoption record was found in the files read.
The CRIF spec gives parse rules (CSV, one row per take with slate columns repeated, SlatesUUID as dedupe key, 'Tk ' take prefix, vertical-tab multi-selects, YYYY/MM/DD timestamps, SLATE-CAMERALETTER file names). It also has unfinished or inconsistent parts: footer 'v0.9c 9/25/2013' versus table 'Version 1.1', a 'Start Height' help text on the End field, mixed feet/inches strings under a numeric-only rule, a TODO on Tk Clip Num, provisional stereo fields. Adoption evidence is vendor pledges (press release, 2013) and two listed integrations; no later adoption record was found in the files read.
Curator qualifications: CRIF parse rules (CSV row per take; SlatesUUID dedupe; vertical-tab multi-selects; YYYY/MM/DD) plus inconsistencies: footer v0.9c 9/25/2013 vs table Version 1.1, wrong help text on End field, feet/inches strings under a numeric-only rule, TODO on Tk Clip Num.
Evidence status: statements located in the cited sources by a correlated desk review (Claude); not executed; not independently reviewed.
Structured fields
{
"citations": [
{
"url": "https://camerareports.org/",
"note": "candidate evidence excerpts"
},
{
"url": "https://docs.google.com/document/d/17CVfBa2a1m2lyve5NFIovfTFC76GF5DE8qdPD1Fd4UI/pub",
"note": "candidate evidence excerpts"
},
{
"url": "https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_A8FBCWZtw2zkUlUi7f02W1UDLgDdBA7u_B1r3ZwsOc/pub",
"note": "candidate evidence excerpts"
},
{
"url": "https://web.archive.org/web/20240616042440id_/https://www.vesglobal.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/ves-camerareportrelease.pdf",
"note": "candidate evidence excerpts"
},
{
"url": "https://www.fxguide.com/?p=47984",
"note": "candidate evidence excerpts"
}
]
}Evidence claims
- [sourced_fact] The CRIF spec gives parse rules (CSV, one row per take with slate columns repeated, SlatesUUID as dedupe key, 'Tk ' take prefix, vertical-tab multi-selects, YYYY/MM/DD timestamps, SLATE-CAMERALETTER file names). It also has unfinished or inconsistent parts: footer 'v0.9c 9/25/2013' versus table 'Version 1.1', a 'Start Height' help text on the End field, mixed feet/inches strings under a numeric-only rule, a TODO on Tk Clip Num, provisional stereo fields. Adoption evidence is vendor pledges (press release, 2013) and two listed integrations; no later adoption record was found in the files read. · locator: candidate evidence excerpts source
Rights
| component | license | hosting | redistribution | modification | training | Evidence and notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| documentation | unknown | permitted | permitted | unknown | unknown | Applies to this original summary only, not to the cited sources. |
Linked records
- cites → https://camerareports.org/
- cites → https://docs.google.com/document/d/17CVfBa2a1m2lyve5NFIovfTFC76GF5DE8qdPD1Fd4UI/pub
- cites → https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_A8FBCWZtw2zkUlUi7f02W1UDLgDdBA7u_B1r3ZwsOc/pub
- cites → https://web.archive.org/web/20240616042440id_/https:/www.vesglobal.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/ves-camerareportrelease.pdf
- cites → https://www.fxguide.com/?p=47984