What do documentary ethics frameworks and case studies say about participant consent and care, including when AI voice or face synthesis is used, and what is the status of the DAWG framework text?
Partially verified: the curator re-read S15; S12, S13, S16, S17, S18 were not re-read by the curator and rest on the producer's pinned reading. Documentary guidance treats AI use on participants as a consent process, not a one-off form. The Documentary Accountability Working Group's public values ask filmmakers to respect participants' dignity and agency and put their wellbeing first; its full framework is behind a sign-up form. The Archival Producers Alliance's June 2025 case studies show two practices. One used synthetic speech built from a participant's own earlier recordings only as a placeholder, then had them re-record the lines in a studio after picture lock. The other took consent on a rolling basis through the edit and used synthetic faces ('digital veiling') while telling participants this is never fully anonymised.
Structured fields
{
"citations": [
{
"url": "https://www.archivalproducersalliance.com/_files/ugd/7e7678_62e802cd834e47a1bdd0a7e21f4dcae6.pdf",
"note": "docaccountability.org/values (live 2026-10-22); archivalproducersalliance.com/robots.txt (same-host receipt)"
},
{
"url": "https://www.archivalproducersalliance.com/_files/ugd/e0763b_4684844d712142c890131f46dcfd9dff.pdf",
"note": "docaccountability.org/values (live 2026-10-22); archivalproducersalliance.com/robots.txt (same-host receipt)"
},
{
"url": "https://www.docaccountability.org/values",
"note": "docaccountability.org/values (live 2026-10-22); archivalproducersalliance.com/robots.txt (same-host receipt)"
},
{
"url": "https://www.docaccountability.org/frameworkfaqs",
"note": "docaccountability.org/values (live 2026-10-22); archivalproducersalliance.com/robots.txt (same-host receipt)"
},
{
"url": "https://www.docaccountability.org/framework",
"note": "docaccountability.org/values (live 2026-10-22); archivalproducersalliance.com/robots.txt (same-host receipt)"
},
{
"url": "https://cmsimpact.org/code/documentary-filmmakers-statement-of-best-practices-in-fair-use",
"note": "cited at https://cmsimpact.org/code/documentary-filmmakers-statement-of-best-practices-in-fair-use/; docaccountability.org/values (live 2026-10-22); archivalproducersalliance.com/robots.txt (same-host receipt)"
},
{
"url": "https://cmsimpact.org/code/documentary-filmmakers-statement-of-best-practices-in-fair-use/",
"note": "observed URL (dated/alias form of the cited catalogue source; canonical identity retained)"
}
]
}Evidence claims
- [sourced_fact] Documentary guidance treats AI use on participants as a consent process, not a one-off form. The Documentary Accountability Working Group's public values ask filmmakers to respect participants' dignity and agency and put their wellbeing first; its full framework is behind a sign-up form. The Archival Producers Alliance's June 2025 case studies show two practices. One used synthetic speech built from a participant's own earlier recordings only as a placeholder, then had them re-record the lines in a studio after picture lock. The other took consent on a rolling basis through the edit and used synthetic faces ('digital veiling') while telling participants this is never fully anonymised. · locator: docaccountability.org/values (live 2026-10-22); archivalproducersalliance.com/robots.txt (same-host receipt) source
Rights
| component | license | hosting | redistribution | modification | training | Evidence and notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| documentation | unknown | permitted | permitted | unknown | unknown | Applies to this original summary only, not to the cited sources. |
Linked records
- cites → https://cmsimpact.org/code/documentary-filmmakers-statement-of-best-practices-in-fair-use
- cites → https://www.archivalproducersalliance.com/_files/ugd/7e7678_62e802cd834e47a1bdd0a7e21f4dcae6.pdf
- cites → https://www.archivalproducersalliance.com/_files/ugd/e0763b_4684844d712142c890131f46dcfd9dff.pdf
- cites → https://www.docaccountability.org/framework
- cites → https://www.docaccountability.org/frameworkfaqs
- cites → https://www.docaccountability.org/values