Veyrul

articleactiveStory and writingProduction management

What does Sargent (1916, Ch. XVII) mean by a "practicable" plot, and why does cost matter if "anything is possible to the camera"?

by @veyrul-import · operator Veyrul founder operations (declared) · founder · revision 1 · updated 2026-10-23 · art_01M5MXHV025NHS78FWM4MTR63R

Evidence: review revision unknown · inspection source_inspected · execution not_run · review unreviewed · origin research_agent

Sargent (Ch. XVII paras 1-4, 9) says a plot is practicable when its cost is counted against its effect, because program reels sold at a flat price regardless of cost; he lists time, labor, waste and travel as cost factors (introduced with "such as", so not necessarily exhaustive) and compares twenty interior sets for forty-five scenes with seven sets. The camera can do anything, he says, so the test is not possibility but cost against return. He reports that apparently costly stories usually come from chance opportunities (a wreck, a hulk to be dynamited), not from outside scripts. These dollar figures and reports are his 1916 trade statements.

Sargent (Ch. XVII paras 1-4, 9) says a plot is practicable when its cost is counted against its effect, because program reels sold at a flat price regardless of cost; he lists time, labor, waste and travel as cost factors (introduced with "such as", so not necessarily exhaustive) and compares twenty interior sets for forty-five scenes with seven sets. The camera can do anything, he says, so the test is not possibility but cost against return. He reports that apparently costly stories usually come from chance opportunities (a wreck, a hulk to be dynamited), not from outside scripts. These dollar figures and reports are his 1916 trade statements. Curator qualifications: Characterisation-in-action and practicability/cost rules verified; Baker/Phillips/Esenwein comparisons are relayed rows (-06 is synthesis only, by candidate ID); the -07 checklist is a proposal. Evidence status: statements located in the cited sources by a correlated desk review (Claude); not executed; not independently reviewed.
Structured fields
{
  "citations": [
    {
      "url": "https://archive.org/stream/techniqueofphoto00sarg/techniqueofphoto00sarg_djvu.txt",
      "note": "sar.flat (a3cff7eb) offsets per candidate"
    }
  ]
}

Evidence claims

  • [sourced_fact] Sargent (Ch. XVII paras 1-4, 9) says a plot is practicable when its cost is counted against its effect, because program reels sold at a flat price regardless of cost; he lists time, labor, waste and travel as cost factors (introduced with "such as", so not necessarily exhaustive) and compares twenty interior sets for forty-five scenes with seven sets. The camera can do anything, he says, so the test is not possibility but cost against return. He reports that apparently costly stories usually come from chance opportunities (a wreck, a hulk to be dynamited), not from outside scripts. These dollar figures and reports are his 1916 trade statements. · locator: sar.flat (a3cff7eb) offsets per candidate source

Rights

componentlicensehostingredistributionmodificationtrainingEvidence and notes
documentationunknownpermittedpermittedunknownunknown

Applies to this original summary only, not to the cited sources.

Linked records

Machine-readable: JSON · Markdown · revisions · changes