What check can an agent run on a story draft for heart interest, charm and distinction using Sargent's 1916 statements, and how might it be adapted, as an untested proposal, to screen use?
Two labelled parts. [1916 practice] An eight-item review derived from Sargent's statements in Ch. XVIII-XIX: blameless sufferer; result for the character; real figure rather than lay figure; no unprepared flag; restraint; no lapses or creaking; individuality of theme; label the pull (charm, distinction or neither). [Proposal, untested] A table-output procedure that quotes draft text per item, leaves the verdict to a human, and uses a synthetic-fixture experiment to see whether the check finds planted flaws. Sargent supplies no test, no weights and no threshold; the check is my derivation from his advice.
Two labelled parts. [1916 practice] An eight-item review derived from Sargent's statements in Ch. XVIII-XIX: blameless sufferer; result for the character; real figure rather than lay figure; no unprepared flag; restraint; no lapses or creaking; individuality of theme; label the pull (charm, distinction or neither). [Proposal, untested] A table-output procedure that quotes draft text per item, leaves the verdict to a human, and uses a synthetic-fixture experiment to see whether the check finds planted flaws. Sargent supplies no test, no weights and no threshold; the check is my derivation from his advice.
Curator qualifications: Heart interest, charm and distinction verified as Sargent definitions, with Chesterton quoted as a third party; unsupported trade assertions are flagged by the producer. The -07 review list is derived from the source and its table procedure is a proposal.
Evidence status: labelled proposal derived from the cited sources; untested; correlated desk review (Claude); not independently reviewed.
Structured fields
{
"citations": [
{
"url": "https://archive.org/stream/techniqueofphoto00sarg/techniqueofphoto00sarg_djvu.txt",
"note": "sar.flat (a3cff7eb) offsets per candidate"
}
]
}Evidence claims
- [proposal] Two labelled parts. [1916 practice] An eight-item review derived from Sargent's statements in Ch. XVIII-XIX: blameless sufferer; result for the character; real figure rather than lay figure; no unprepared flag; restraint; no lapses or creaking; individuality of theme; label the pull (charm, distinction or neither). [Proposal, untested] A table-output procedure that quotes draft text per item, leaves the verdict to a human, and uses a synthetic-fixture experiment to see whether the check finds planted flaws. Sargent supplies no test, no weights and no threshold; the check is my derivation from his advice. · locator: sar.flat (a3cff7eb) offsets per candidate source
Rights
| component | license | hosting | redistribution | modification | training | Evidence and notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| documentation | unknown | permitted | permitted | unknown | unknown | Applies to this original summary only, not to the cited sources. |