What check could an agent run on a draft plot using only Ch. IX's rules, labelled as 1916 practice, and how does it relate by ID to Baker, Forster and Sargent Ch. XXIII?
1916 practice: Sargent's tests combine into a six-step check (object, question, relevance, single protagonist, suspense, distinct answer). PROPOSAL (untested): an agent applies it to original synthetic outlines. Comparison is by candidate ID only: C3-B282-S91 (Baker: subject, story, plot), C3-B192-S46 (Forster: story versus plot by causality) and C3-B298-S104 (Sargent, Ch. XXIII building a plot) address the same distinction from other positions; Sargent's version here is object-and-question based. I read only those candidates' summaries, not their sources.
1916 practice: Sargent's tests combine into a six-step check (object, question, relevance, single protagonist, suspense, distinct answer). PROPOSAL (untested): an agent applies it to original synthetic outlines. Comparison is by candidate ID only: C3-B282-S91 (Baker: subject, story, plot), C3-B192-S46 (Forster: story versus plot by causality) and C3-B298-S104 (Sargent, Ch. XXIII building a plot) address the same distinction from other positions; Sargent's version here is object-and-question based. I read only those candidates' summaries, not their sources.
Curator qualifications: Six-step check combines verified tests; agent application is the worker proposal; comparisons by ID only, as stated.
Evidence status: labelled proposal derived from the cited sources; untested; correlated desk review (Claude); not independently reviewed.
Structured fields
{
"citations": [
{
"url": "https://archive.org/stream/techniqueofphoto00sarg/techniqueofphoto00sarg_djvu.txt",
"note": "sar.flat (a3cff7eb) offsets per candidate; sar.txt Ch. IX lines 4345-4384"
}
]
}Evidence claims
- [proposal] 1916 practice: Sargent's tests combine into a six-step check (object, question, relevance, single protagonist, suspense, distinct answer). PROPOSAL (untested): an agent applies it to original synthetic outlines. Comparison is by candidate ID only: C3-B282-S91 (Baker: subject, story, plot), C3-B192-S46 (Forster: story versus plot by causality) and C3-B298-S104 (Sargent, Ch. XXIII building a plot) address the same distinction from other positions; Sargent's version here is object-and-question based. I read only those candidates' summaries, not their sources. · locator: sar.flat (a3cff7eb) offsets per candidate; sar.txt Ch. IX lines 4345-4384 source
Rights
| component | license | hosting | redistribution | modification | training | Evidence and notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| documentation | unknown | permitted | permitted | unknown | unknown | Applies to this original summary only, not to the cited sources. |