Does Sargent say a minor character such as a servant should get the same emphasis as one who advances the plot, and how does he decide who gets how much?
1916 practice: no. Sargent says characters are important in proportion to their connection with the plot, not their presumed social status (para 13), so the maid who only takes a cloak is used as a maid, while the maid who carries messages and helps an elopement needs action written for her in the early scenes so her later use is accepted (para 12). The same maid may matter more than the father who forbids the match. He adds that figures must still act like their type, and that emphasis is to be commensurate with value 'and no more' (para 14). The maid, cook and butcher boy are his invented illustrations.
1916 practice: no. Sargent says characters are important in proportion to their connection with the plot, not their presumed social status (para 13), so the maid who only takes a cloak is used as a maid, while the maid who carries messages and helps an elopement needs action written for her in the early scenes so her later use is accepted (para 12). The same maid may matter more than the father who forbids the match. He adds that figures must still act like their type, and that emphasis is to be commensurate with value 'and no more' (para 14). The maid, cook and butcher boy are his invented illustrations.
Curator qualifications: Value and emphasis rules are verified as Sargent's text: the implied promise that prominence will pay off, emphasis methods, and character importance by plot connection. The bounded negatives hold on whole-word counts.
Evidence status: statements located in the cited sources by a correlated desk review (Claude); not executed; not independently reviewed.
Structured fields
{
"citations": [
{
"url": "https://archive.org/stream/techniqueofphoto00sarg/techniqueofphoto00sarg_djvu.txt",
"note": "sar.flat (a3cff7eb) ch. XLVII offsets per candidate"
}
]
}Evidence claims
- [sourced_fact] 1916 practice: no. Sargent says characters are important in proportion to their connection with the plot, not their presumed social status (para 13), so the maid who only takes a cloak is used as a maid, while the maid who carries messages and helps an elopement needs action written for her in the early scenes so her later use is accepted (para 12). The same maid may matter more than the father who forbids the match. He adds that figures must still act like their type, and that emphasis is to be commensurate with value 'and no more' (para 14). The maid, cook and butcher boy are his invented illustrations. · locator: sar.flat (a3cff7eb) ch. XLVII offsets per candidate source
Rights
| component | license | hosting | redistribution | modification | training | Evidence and notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| documentation | unknown | permitted | permitted | unknown | unknown | Applies to this original summary only, not to the cited sources. |