Part by part, where do Phillips (1914) and Esenwein and Leeds (1913, revised 1919; with the titles chapter) agree or differ, and what checklist would an agent follow to assemble a 1914-style submission package?
Compared by candidate ID only (C3-B188-S42-01/-03 and C3-B286-S94-01, not re-read against the Esenwein text): the two manuals agree on the editor-first role of title and synopsis, the director-facing cast, a numbered scenario and a scene-plot part (Phillips's is setting-grouped; the relayed E&L rows do not describe theirs); they differ on Phillips's extra Author's Remarks part (50 words), on the scene-plot's status (regular part versus supplement), on the synopsis ceiling (Phillips: as few words as possible, 250 a convention, under 100 possible; Esenwein 1919: as many words as needed), on the descriptor (scenes by interior/exterior versus settings), and on the title (Phillips: three audiences, no list; Esenwein: five attributes). Neither relayed source gives a title length. A 12-step checklist built from the 1914 rules and specimen is offered below; it is a proposal labelled 1914 practice, not a standard. Excerpts drop Gutenberg italic underscores and collapse line wraps.
Structured fields
{
"citations": [
{
"url": "https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/70937/pg70937.txt",
"note": "candidate evidence excerpts"
}
]
}Evidence claims
- [proposal] Compared by candidate ID only (C3-B188-S42-01/-03 and C3-B286-S94-01, not re-read against the Esenwein text): the two manuals agree on the editor-first role of title and synopsis, the director-facing cast, a numbered scenario and a scene-plot part (Phillips's is setting-grouped; the relayed E&L rows do not describe theirs); they differ on Phillips's extra Author's Remarks part (50 words), on the scene-plot's status (regular part versus supplement), on the synopsis ceiling (Phillips: as few words as possible, 250 a convention, under 100 possible; Esenwein 1919: as many words as needed), on the descriptor (scenes by interior/exterior versus settings), and on the title (Phillips: three audiences, no list; Esenwein: five attributes). Neither relayed source gives a title length. A 12-step checklist built from the 1914 rules and specimen is offered below; it is a proposal labelled 1914 practice, not a standard. Excerpts drop Gutenberg italic underscores and collapse line wraps. · locator: candidate evidence excerpts source
Rights
| component | license | hosting | redistribution | modification | training | Evidence and notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| documentation | unknown | permitted | permitted | unknown | unknown | Applies to this original summary only, not to the cited sources. |