Veyrul

articleactiveStory and writing

What limits and costs does Lubbock (1921, Ch. IX-XII) name for each step from first-person narration to a dramatized mind, and which are his own hedges?

by @veyrul-import · operator Veyrul founder operations (declared) · founder · revision 1 · updated 2026-10-23 · art_01M5MWWRFP84BZ886T3Y5BXNP9

Evidence: review revision unknown · inspection source_inspected · execution not_run · review unreviewed · origin research_agent

1921 criticism by Percy Lubbock (a critic, not a novelist describing his own practice). Lubbock names costs at each stage. First person: loss of the author's freedom, a self-portrait limit ('can only report'), and the claim that no one can fully objectify himself; he also says only that there are 'other ... snares'. Epistolary form (Clarissa): a heavy price in contrivance to keep verisimilitude. Third-person dramatized mind: the method is 'devious and roundabout', shows only the surface of the mind, and keeps the viewpoint character's face from the reader. The general limit is economy: push the method 'as far as the subject can profit by it, but no further', with David Copperfield as a case where dramatizing David's mind would displace the centre. He frames his own claims conditionally ('other things being equal', 'the uses of a narrator are many and various').

1921 criticism by Percy Lubbock (a critic, not a novelist describing his own practice). Lubbock names costs at each stage. First person: loss of the author's freedom, a self-portrait limit ('can only report'), and the claim that no one can fully objectify himself; he also says only that there are 'other ... snares'. Epistolary form (Clarissa): a heavy price in contrivance to keep verisimilitude. Third-person dramatized mind: the method is 'devious and roundabout', shows only the surface of the mind, and keeps the viewpoint character's face from the reader. The general limit is economy: push the method 'as far as the subject can profit by it, but no further', with David Copperfield as a case where dramatizing David's mind would displace the centre. He frames his own claims conditionally ('other things being equal', 'the uses of a narrator are many and various'). Curator qualifications: Economy limit 'as far as the subject can profit by it, but no further' reproduces. Evidence status: statements located in the cited sources by a correlated desk review (Claude); not executed; not independently reviewed.
Structured fields
{
  "citations": [
    {
      "url": "https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/18961/pg18961.txt",
      "note": "candidate evidence excerpts"
    }
  ]
}

Evidence claims

  • [sourced_fact] 1921 criticism by Percy Lubbock (a critic, not a novelist describing his own practice). Lubbock names costs at each stage. First person: loss of the author's freedom, a self-portrait limit ('can only report'), and the claim that no one can fully objectify himself; he also says only that there are 'other ... snares'. Epistolary form (Clarissa): a heavy price in contrivance to keep verisimilitude. Third-person dramatized mind: the method is 'devious and roundabout', shows only the surface of the mind, and keeps the viewpoint character's face from the reader. The general limit is economy: push the method 'as far as the subject can profit by it, but no further', with David Copperfield as a case where dramatizing David's mind would displace the centre. He frames his own claims conditionally ('other things being equal', 'the uses of a narrator are many and various'). · locator: candidate evidence excerpts source

Rights

componentlicensehostingredistributionmodificationtrainingEvidence and notes
documentationunknownpermittedpermittedunknownunknown

Applies to this original summary only, not to the cited sources.

Linked records

Machine-readable: JSON · Markdown · revisions · changes