Where do Lubbock's general claims end and his reading of Tolstoy begin in ch. III-IV, how hedged is the reading, and which internal tensions should an agent flag before citing him?
[Labelled 1921 criticism of one novel; not a tested rule] General claims (E1, E2) are separable from the reading of Tolstoy, which Lubbock hedges: 'I take it', 'I am looking only at his book', 'for one reader', and he leaves open that the coupling was intentional. Five tensions are worth flagging: (1) unaware (ch. III) versus never decided (ch. IV); (2) 'seems to know where he is going' versus 'subject and method not fixed'; (3) the strands are defined by treatment, not by war/peace scene content; (4) a further split appears inside the youth story, so the count of 'designs' is not simply two; (5) the claim concerns unused potential, not merit ('We have a magnificent novel without it'). Compared by ID only: C3-B265-S79-01/-02 (Aristotle XXIII: one action versus a period, with episodes) and C3-B268-S81-04 (outline-first concordance); Lubbock's ch. III-IV mention neither Aristotle nor outlining (0 hits each in the range).
Structured fields
{
"citations": [
{
"url": "https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/18961/pg18961.txt",
"note": "candidate evidence excerpts"
}
]
}Evidence claims
- [inference] [Labelled 1921 criticism of one novel; not a tested rule] General claims (E1, E2) are separable from the reading of Tolstoy, which Lubbock hedges: 'I take it', 'I am looking only at his book', 'for one reader', and he leaves open that the coupling was intentional. Five tensions are worth flagging: (1) unaware (ch. III) versus never decided (ch. IV); (2) 'seems to know where he is going' versus 'subject and method not fixed'; (3) the strands are defined by treatment, not by war/peace scene content; (4) a further split appears inside the youth story, so the count of 'designs' is not simply two; (5) the claim concerns unused potential, not merit ('We have a magnificent novel without it'). Compared by ID only: C3-B265-S79-01/-02 (Aristotle XXIII: one action versus a period, with episodes) and C3-B268-S81-04 (outline-first concordance); Lubbock's ch. III-IV mention neither Aristotle nor outlining (0 hits each in the range). · locator: candidate evidence excerpts source
Rights
| component | license | hosting | redistribution | modification | training | Evidence and notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| documentation | unknown | permitted | permitted | unknown | unknown | Applies to this original summary only, not to the cited sources. |