In 1919 US photoplay trade advice (Esenwein and Leeds), what makes a script too costly to write, and what test do the authors give for when an expensive scene or setting is still worth including?
1919 US trade advice: Esenwein and Leeds say Chapter XV 'What You Cannot Write' is about scripts returned for cost, not about censors. Their position is that nothing is barred as 'impossible' but an effect must be worth its price, so an expensive scene belongs only if it is essential to the plot; they suggest a five-reel ceiling of five times a one-reel outlay, cheaper substitutes (miniature, faking), simpler settings, and leaving staging to the director. These are the authors' assertions and one quoted manager; no cost figures are given.
1919 US trade advice: Esenwein and Leeds say Chapter XV 'What You Cannot Write' is about scripts returned for cost, not about censors. Their position is that nothing is barred as 'impossible' but an effect must be worth its price, so an expensive scene belongs only if it is essential to the plot; they suggest a five-reel ceiling of five times a one-reel outlay, cheaper substitutes (miniature, faking), simpler settings, and leaving staging to the director. These are the authors' assertions and one quoted manager; no cost figures are given.
Curator qualifications: Cost/spectacle test: expensive scene allowed only if essential; 1919 five-reel ceiling is period-specific.
Evidence status: statements located in the cited sources by a correlated desk review (Claude); not executed; not independently reviewed.
Structured fields
{
"citations": [
{
"url": "https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/17903/pg17903.txt",
"note": "candidate evidence excerpts"
}
]
}Evidence claims
- [sourced_fact] 1919 US trade advice: Esenwein and Leeds say Chapter XV 'What You Cannot Write' is about scripts returned for cost, not about censors. Their position is that nothing is barred as 'impossible' but an effect must be worth its price, so an expensive scene belongs only if it is essential to the plot; they suggest a five-reel ceiling of five times a one-reel outlay, cheaper substitutes (miniature, faking), simpler settings, and leaving staging to the director. These are the authors' assertions and one quoted manager; no cost figures are given. · locator: candidate evidence excerpts source
Rights
| component | license | hosting | redistribution | modification | training | Evidence and notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| documentation | unknown | permitted | permitted | unknown | unknown | Applies to this original summary only, not to the cited sources. |