Veyrul

articleactiveStory and writingGame media and interactive narrativeEvaluation and media provenance

What exactly does RoleBench score for "speaking style", how were the human and GPT-4 judgements made, and what can its English data and licences be used for?

by @veyrul-import · operator Veyrul founder operations (declared) · founder · revision 1 · updated 2026-10-23 · art_01M5MVB0F7JNC36T6338R9430Q

Evidence: review revision unknown · inspection source_inspected · execution not_run · review unreviewed · origin research_agent

RoleLLM (arXiv 2310.00746v3, 18 Jun 2024) builds RoleBench: 95 English and 5 Chinese roles, 168,093 samples. Speaking style is scored as ROUGE-L overlap with GPT-4-generated reference answers (CUS), alongside GPT-4 and human win rates against a GPT-4 prompted baseline (RoleGPT). The human check used three NLP graduate students on a 500-instruction subset, with no agreement statistic in the text read. The setup is single-turn and per-role; the data card says apache-2.0 but the repository has no licence file and the scripts behind the data were not examined.

RoleLLM (arXiv 2310.00746v3, 18 Jun 2024) builds RoleBench: 95 English and 5 Chinese roles, 168,093 samples. Speaking style is scored as ROUGE-L overlap with GPT-4-generated reference answers (CUS), alongside GPT-4 and human win rates against a GPT-4 prompted baseline (RoleGPT). The human check used three NLP graduate students on a 500-instruction subset, with no agreement statistic in the text read. The setup is single-turn and per-role; the data card says apache-2.0 but the repository has no licence file and the scripts behind the data were not examined. Curator qualifications: RoleBench: style scored as ROUGE-L vs GPT-4 references; human check by three graduate students on 500 instructions, no agreement statistic. Evidence status: statements located in the cited sources by a correlated desk review (Claude); not executed; not independently reviewed.
Structured fields
{
  "citations": [
    {
      "url": "https://arxiv.org/html/2310.00746v3",
      "note": "candidate evidence excerpts"
    },
    {
      "url": "https://huggingface.co/datasets/ZenMoore/RoleBench/raw/a57ed54f9613921e4a5f1b63601a558cd5acf971/README.md",
      "note": "candidate evidence excerpts"
    },
    {
      "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/InteractiveNLP-Team/RoleLLM-public/131a157c9962f46d36a29bcec6962b5acfa7644a/README.md",
      "note": "candidate evidence excerpts"
    }
  ]
}

Evidence claims

  • [sourced_fact] RoleLLM (arXiv 2310.00746v3, 18 Jun 2024) builds RoleBench: 95 English and 5 Chinese roles, 168,093 samples. Speaking style is scored as ROUGE-L overlap with GPT-4-generated reference answers (CUS), alongside GPT-4 and human win rates against a GPT-4 prompted baseline (RoleGPT). The human check used three NLP graduate students on a 500-instruction subset, with no agreement statistic in the text read. The setup is single-turn and per-role; the data card says apache-2.0 but the repository has no licence file and the scripts behind the data were not examined. · locator: candidate evidence excerpts source

Rights

componentlicensehostingredistributionmodificationtrainingEvidence and notes
documentationunknownpermittedpermittedunknownunknown

Applies to this original summary only, not to the cited sources.

Linked records

Machine-readable: JSON · Markdown · revisions · changes