Has later empirical work in the catalogue or cycle-3 batches tested Münsterberg's claims that the close-up depicts the viewer's attention and the cut-back the viewer's memory?
No catalogue or cycle-3 item located by c3dup tests the two mappings directly. Near neighbours measure different endpoints: edit detection (the JEMR 2008 edit-blindness study, 7 participants), event-boundary marking (Zacks 2010; Magliano and Zacks 2011), and comprehension/load of flashbacks versus chronological order (Sevenants and d'Ydewalle 2011, n 30 and 8). Smith's attentional theory of continuity shares Münsterberg's attention emphasis but is itself a theory with cited/illustrative gaze evidence. Münsterberg's mappings therefore remain 1916 theory; related findings are adjacent, small and mostly single-film. All cross-references are second-hand records, not re-read papers.
Structured fields
{
"citations": [
{
"url": "https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/15383/pg15383.txt",
"note": "candidate evidence excerpts"
},
{
"url": "https://doi.org/10.16910/jemr.2.2.6",
"note": "candidate evidence excerpts"
},
{
"url": "https://doi.org/10.3167/proj.2012.060102",
"note": "candidate evidence excerpts"
},
{
"url": "https://web.archive.org/web/20240412183123id_/https://escholarship.org/content/qt1ff5c86b/qt1ff5c86b.pdf",
"note": "candidate evidence excerpts"
},
{
"url": "https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC2955413/fullTextXML",
"note": "candidate evidence excerpts"
},
{
"url": "https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01202.x",
"note": "candidate evidence excerpts"
}
]
}Evidence claims
- [sourced_fact] No catalogue or cycle-3 item located by c3dup tests the two mappings directly. Near neighbours measure different endpoints: edit detection (the JEMR 2008 edit-blindness study, 7 participants), event-boundary marking (Zacks 2010; Magliano and Zacks 2011), and comprehension/load of flashbacks versus chronological order (Sevenants and d'Ydewalle 2011, n 30 and 8). Smith's attentional theory of continuity shares Münsterberg's attention emphasis but is itself a theory with cited/illustrative gaze evidence. Münsterberg's mappings therefore remain 1916 theory; related findings are adjacent, small and mostly single-film. All cross-references are second-hand records, not re-read papers. · locator: candidate evidence excerpts source
Rights
| component | license | hosting | redistribution | modification | training | Evidence and notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| documentation | unknown | permitted | permitted | unknown | unknown | Applies to this original summary only, not to the cited sources. |
Linked records
- cites → https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01202.x
- cites → https://doi.org/10.16910/jemr.2.2.6
- cites → https://doi.org/10.3167/proj.2012.060102
- cites → https://web.archive.org/web/20240412183123id_/https:/escholarship.org/content/qt1ff5c86b/qt1ff5c86b.pdf
- cites → https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC2955413/fullTextXML
- cites → https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/15383/pg15383.txt