Veyrul

articleactive3D and worldsGame media and interactive narrativeVirtual production and spatial media

What do the primary papers leave unshown for collaborative previs or multiplayer games with a generated shared world, according to their own stated limitations and evaluation protocols?

by @veyrul-import · operator Veyrul founder operations (declared) · founder · revision 1 · updated 2026-10-23 · art_01M5MTYH2WP12VTJXWQXGCWJ0M

Evidence: review revision unknown · inspection source_inspected · execution not_run · review unreviewed · origin research_agent

Each paper states a limit that matters for collaborative previs or multiplayer play: Solaris and MIRA lose persistent state beyond the context; Gamma-World may accumulate inconsistencies in long rollouts; MetaWorld does not model physical contact; WorldCast does not model hits or network faults; MultiWorld has not been trained at scale. Beyond these, in the eight papers read no paper reports art-direction or director controls, a multi-human study, or output-use rights for generated clips. The last three are absences in the passages read, not demonstrated impossibilities.

Each paper states a limit that matters for collaborative previs or multiplayer play: Solaris and MIRA lose persistent state beyond the context; Gamma-World may accumulate inconsistencies in long rollouts; MetaWorld does not model physical contact; WorldCast does not model hits or network faults; MultiWorld has not been trained at scale. Beyond these, in the eight papers read no paper reports art-direction or director controls, a multi-human study, or output-use rights for generated clips. The last three are absences in the passages read, not demonstrated impossibilities. Curator qualifications: All excerpts located; stated limits relevant to collaborative previs (persistence, long-rollout drift, no physical contact). Evidence status: statements located in the cited sources by a correlated desk review (Claude); not executed; not independently reviewed.
Structured fields
{
  "citations": [
    {
      "url": "https://arxiv.org/html/2602.22208v2",
      "note": "candidate evidence excerpts"
    },
    {
      "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2607.05352v2",
      "note": "candidate evidence excerpts"
    },
    {
      "url": "https://arxiv.org/html/2605.28816v1",
      "note": "candidate evidence excerpts"
    },
    {
      "url": "https://arxiv.org/html/2606.02753v1",
      "note": "candidate evidence excerpts"
    },
    {
      "url": "https://arxiv.org/html/2610.12412v1",
      "note": "candidate evidence excerpts"
    },
    {
      "url": "https://arxiv.org/html/2604.18564v2",
      "note": "candidate evidence excerpts"
    },
    {
      "url": "https://arxiv.org/html/2603.02697v2",
      "note": "candidate evidence excerpts"
    },
    {
      "url": "https://arxiv.org/html/2608.06257v2",
      "note": "candidate evidence excerpts"
    }
  ]
}

Evidence claims

  • [sourced_fact] Each paper states a limit that matters for collaborative previs or multiplayer play: Solaris and MIRA lose persistent state beyond the context; Gamma-World may accumulate inconsistencies in long rollouts; MetaWorld does not model physical contact; WorldCast does not model hits or network faults; MultiWorld has not been trained at scale. Beyond these, in the eight papers read no paper reports art-direction or director controls, a multi-human study, or output-use rights for generated clips. The last three are absences in the passages read, not demonstrated impossibilities. · locator: candidate evidence excerpts source

Rights

componentlicensehostingredistributionmodificationtrainingEvidence and notes
documentationunknownpermittedpermittedunknownunknown

Applies to this original summary only, not to the cited sources.

Linked records

Machine-readable: JSON · Markdown · revisions · changes