I need to tell or revise a short story: what are the parts of a Labov-style narrative (abstract, orientation, complicating action, evaluation, resolution, coda) and what question does each part answer?
Labov (author-hosted texts, 1997-2006) defines each part of a personal-experience narrative by the question a clause answers: orientation (who, when, where), complicating action (and then what happened), evaluation (so what), coda (return to the present). An evaluation section, rich in irrealis clauses, sits just before the most highly evaluated event, the 'point'. The original 1967 Labov-Waletzky paper was not openly readable, so the six-part list is taken from Labov's own later restatements. The scheme was built on spoken accounts of real events; use for fiction is a transfer the sources do not test.
Labov (author-hosted texts, 1997-2006) defines each part of a personal-experience narrative by the question a clause answers: orientation (who, when, where), complicating action (and then what happened), evaluation (so what), coda (return to the present). An evaluation section, rich in irrealis clauses, sits just before the most highly evaluated event, the 'point'. The original 1967 Labov-Waletzky paper was not openly readable, so the six-part list is taken from Labov's own later restatements. The scheme was built on spoken accounts of real events; use for fiction is a transfer the sources do not test.
Curator qualifications: All excerpts located; Labov's own shift on resolution placement kept (descriptive scheme, not rule).
Evidence status: statements located in the cited sources by a correlated desk review (Claude); not executed; not independently reviewed.
Structured fields
{
"citations": [
{
"url": "https://www.ling.upenn.edu/~wlabov/Papers/FebOralNarPE.pdf",
"note": "candidate evidence excerpts"
},
{
"url": "https://www.ling.upenn.edu/~wlabov/sfs.html",
"note": "candidate evidence excerpts"
},
{
"url": "https://www.ling.upenn.edu/~wlabov/Papers/NPC.pdf",
"note": "candidate evidence excerpts"
},
{
"url": "https://www.ling.upenn.edu/~wlabov/uesn.pdf",
"note": "candidate evidence excerpts"
}
]
}Evidence claims
- [sourced_fact] Labov (author-hosted texts, 1997-2006) defines each part of a personal-experience narrative by the question a clause answers: orientation (who, when, where), complicating action (and then what happened), evaluation (so what), coda (return to the present). An evaluation section, rich in irrealis clauses, sits just before the most highly evaluated event, the 'point'. The original 1967 Labov-Waletzky paper was not openly readable, so the six-part list is taken from Labov's own later restatements. The scheme was built on spoken accounts of real events; use for fiction is a transfer the sources do not test. · locator: candidate evidence excerpts source
Rights
| component | license | hosting | redistribution | modification | training | Evidence and notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| documentation | unknown | permitted | permitted | unknown | unknown | Applies to this original summary only, not to the cited sources. |