How do practitioner and digital-era sources qualify film-era lighting-ratio rules?
The inspected sources do not replace the 1953 numbers with a digital equivalent. They move the decision to measured stops from exposure tests (CML, film era), consistency within a scene's coverage, light meter/false colour/waveform checks, and the trade between raising key and cutting fill for noise versus highlight headroom (Deakins forum, 2023 and 2025). No manufacturer sensor-latitude statement was retrieved, so any digital numeric rule is unsupported here.
The inspected sources do not replace the 1953 numbers with a digital equivalent. They move the decision to measured stops from exposure tests (CML, film era), consistency within a scene's coverage, light meter/false colour/waveform checks, and the trade between raising key and cutting fill for noise versus highlight headroom (Deakins forum, 2023 and 2025). No manufacturer sensor-latitude statement was retrieved, so any digital numeric rule is unsupported here.
Curator qualifications: All quotes verified. The flagged 'conflict' is a reported range of practitioner preferences (ratios rejected, used, or useful for teaching), not contradictory evidence. The 4:1 ceiling is tied to colour film in the 1953 source; no digital-sensor ceiling is supported (producer bound correct). Attribution of the 'T-stops and ratios' reply is ambiguous in the mailing-list signature layout (Nick Anthony vs Brent Reynolds); cite it as 'a list participant'. Reclassify conflicting_evidence as a range of practitioner views.
Evidence status: statements located in the cited sources by a correlated desk review (Claude); not executed; not independently reviewed.
Structured fields
{
"citations": [
{
"url": "https://cinematography.net/edited-pages/LightingRatios.htm",
"note": "producer work copy work/cn.raw; producer work copy work/dk1.raw; producer work copy work/dk2.raw; producer work copy work/sg.raw; producer work copy work/mm.txt"
},
{
"url": "https://www.rogerdeakins.com/forums/topic/lighting-ratios/",
"note": "producer work copy work/cn.raw; producer work copy work/dk1.raw; producer work copy work/dk2.raw; producer work copy work/sg.raw; producer work copy work/mm.txt"
},
{
"url": "https://www.rogerdeakins.com/forums/topic/contrast-ratio-2/",
"note": "producer work copy work/cn.raw; producer work copy work/dk1.raw; producer work copy work/dk2.raw; producer work copy work/sg.raw; producer work copy work/mm.txt"
},
{
"url": "https://education.siggraph.org/static/HyperGraph/lighting/lighting_film_video.htm",
"note": "producer work copy work/cn.raw; producer work copy work/dk1.raw; producer work copy work/dk2.raw; producer work copy work/sg.raw; producer work copy work/mm.txt"
}
]
}Evidence claims
- [sourced_fact] The inspected sources do not replace the 1953 numbers with a digital equivalent. They move the decision to measured stops from exposure tests (CML, film era), consistency within a scene's coverage, light meter/false colour/waveform checks, and the trade between raising key and cutting fill for noise versus highlight headroom (Deakins forum, 2023 and 2025). No manufacturer sensor-latitude statement was retrieved, so any digital numeric rule is unsupported here. · locator: producer work copy work/cn.raw; producer work copy work/dk1.raw; producer work copy work/dk2.raw; producer work copy work/sg.raw; producer work copy work/mm.txt source
Rights
| component | license | hosting | redistribution | modification | training | Evidence and notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| documentation | unknown | permitted | permitted | unknown | unknown | Applies to this original summary only, not to the cited sources. |