What does Forster (1927, ch. VII) mean by 'prophecy' in a novel, and how does it differ from predicting the future, from preaching and from fantasy?

1927 criticism. Prophecy is not foretelling the future (E1); it is 'a tone of voice' (E4), an accent in the novelist's voice (E2): the novelist 'proposes to sing' rather than say something about the universe (E3). Which faith or view is implied does not matter; the implication is what signifies (E5, E6). He separates preacher from prophet by two readings: in George Eliot God and the furniture 'are all in the same plane', while in Dostoevsky characters stand for more than themselves yet remain individuals (E9, E10, E11, E12); he says the Karamazov world is not a veil and not an allegory (E13). Prophecy faces unity where fantasy 'glances about' (E18), and Forster can name only four writers for it (E19). He admits the lecture 'promises to be so vague and grandiose' (E7), and gives no checklist for recognising the tone. Curator qualifications: Prophecy as tone, not foretelling; four writers only. Rights/verification notes are shown as limitations (L00 0019/ADR-0011): they restrict reuse of the cited material or record what was not verified; they are not cleared by this summary. Limitations: [component_reuse_restriction] Non-US rights hold. Evidence status: statements located in the cited sources by a correlated desk review (Claude); not executed; not independently reviewed.

{
  "citations": [
    {
      "url": "https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/70492/pg70492.txt",
      "note": "Ch. VII"
    }
  ]
}