Which events in a narrative text can I treat as established story-world facts, and which kinds of statement should I leave out because they are only believed, hoped, hypothetical, future or narratorial summary?
LitBank's event layer is a worked, openly readable rule for the 'story-world fact' layer: tag only events asserted as actually occurring (past/present, positive polarity, specific, in the narrative frame); believed, hypothetical, desired, future and generic events and narrator summaries outside the imagined world are not tagged. The paper reports kappa 0.813 on five texts between two co-authors and documents a hard case (narrator addressing the reader). The layer says nothing about who asserts an event or who believes it, so it supplies layer (c) only, and in Persuasion chapter 1 the annotation file shows a reported 'was married' untagged while the narrator's later 'purchased independence' is tagged (observation; reasons not documented).
Structured fields
{
"citations": [
{
"url": "https://aclanthology.org/P19-1353.pdf",
"note": "ACL P19-1353 PDF (pdftotext L87, L372); litbank README.md at 3e50db0 L15"
},
{
"url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dbamman/litbank/3e50db0ffc033d7ccbb94f4d88f6b99210328ed8/README.md",
"note": "ACL P19-1353 PDF (pdftotext L87, L372); litbank README.md at 3e50db0 L15"
},
{
"url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dbamman/litbank/3e50db0ffc033d7ccbb94f4d88f6b99210328ed8/events/brat/105_persuasion_brat.ann",
"note": "ACL P19-1353 PDF (pdftotext L87, L372); litbank README.md at 3e50db0 L15"
}
]
}Evidence claims
- [sourced_fact] LitBank's event layer is a worked, openly readable rule for the 'story-world fact' layer: tag only events asserted as actually occurring (past/present, positive polarity, specific, in the narrative frame); believed, hypothetical, desired, future and generic events and narrator summaries outside the imagined world are not tagged. The paper reports kappa 0.813 on five texts between two co-authors and documents a hard case (narrator addressing the reader). The layer says nothing about who asserts an event or who believes it, so it supplies layer (c) only, and in Persuasion chapter 1 the annotation file shows a reported 'was married' untagged while the narrator's later 'purchased independence' is tagged (observation; reasons not documented). · locator: ACL P19-1353 PDF (pdftotext L87, L372); litbank README.md at 3e50db0 L15 source
Rights
| component | license | hosting | redistribution | modification | training | Evidence and notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| documentation | unknown | permitted | permitted | unknown | unknown | Applies to this original summary only, not to the cited sources. |