What failure modes (cliche, broken genre contract, mis-keyed convention) do Aristotle, Archer and the Living Handbook entries name, and what evaluation checks can an agent run against a genre's expectations?
Across the pinned sources the named failures are: balking a definite expectation (Archer); over-preparation so tricks are foreseen and resented (Archer); a convention practised so long that its falseness is no longer noticed, and stock devices that later become offensive (Archer); an incident from the wrong mode, such as a melodramatic scene out of key with an idyllic play (Archer); incidents giving the monstrous instead of the genre's proper pleasure (Aristotle); and coherence judged by the wrong genre's standard (Toolan). Counter-evidence shows conventions shift: devices accepted in one period become offensive, and Hitchcock's 'lying' flashback judged a failure by him is later embedded in more complex structures. The LHN film entry notes 'fictional contracts with the audience' beyond verisimilitude, and the Schemata entry says detective clues can be buried by making descriptions schema-consistent. The audit procedure below is a synthesis; no source supplies a validated test.
Structured fields
{
"citations": [
{
"url": "https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/10865/pg10865.txt",
"note": "see curator disposition"
},
{
"url": "https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/1974/pg1974.txt",
"note": "see curator disposition"
},
{
"url": "https://www-archiv.fdm.uni-hamburg.de/lhn/node/54.html",
"note": "see curator disposition"
},
{
"url": "https://www-archiv.fdm.uni-hamburg.de/lhn/node/64.html",
"note": "see curator disposition"
},
{
"url": "https://www-archiv.fdm.uni-hamburg.de/lhn/node/33.html",
"note": "see curator disposition"
},
{
"url": "https://www-archiv.fdm.uni-hamburg.de/lhn/node/69.html",
"note": "see curator disposition"
}
]
}Evidence claims
- [sourced_fact] Across the pinned sources the named failures are: balking a definite expectation (Archer); over-preparation so tricks are foreseen and resented (Archer); a convention practised so long that its falseness is no longer noticed, and stock devices that later become offensive (Archer); an incident from the wrong mode, such as a melodramatic scene out of key with an idyllic play (Archer); incidents giving the monstrous instead of the genre's proper pleasure (Aristotle); and coherence judged by the wrong genre's standard (Toolan). Counter-evidence shows conventions shift: devices accepted in one period become offensive, and Hitchcock's 'lying' flashback judged a failure by him is later embedded in more complex structures. The LHN film entry notes 'fictional contracts with the audience' beyond verisimilitude, and the Schemata entry says detective clues can be buried by making descriptions schema-consistent. The audit procedure below is a synthesis; no source supplies a validated test. · locator: see curator disposition source
Rights
| component | license | hosting | redistribution | modification | training | Evidence and notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| documentation | unknown | permitted | permitted | unknown | unknown | Applies to this original summary only, not to the cited sources. |
Linked records
- cites → https://www-archiv.fdm.uni-hamburg.de/lhn/node/33.html
- cites → https://www-archiv.fdm.uni-hamburg.de/lhn/node/54.html
- cites → https://www-archiv.fdm.uni-hamburg.de/lhn/node/64.html
- cites → https://www-archiv.fdm.uni-hamburg.de/lhn/node/69.html
- cites → https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/10865/pg10865.txt
- cites → https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/1974/pg1974.txt