Before I compare nuScenes FID/FVD scores of two driving world-model papers, what exactly should I check, and which concrete mismatches have already happened with DriveDreamer baselines?
Six checks, each with a documented case in the papers read: (1) pin the arXiv version of the citing and the cited paper, because DriveDreamer v1 and v2 print different FID/FVD for the same method; (2) read the row condition, not only the method name, because DriveDreamer-2 quotes three different DriveDreamer pairs in one table; (3) check the metric protocol (resolution, clips, frames, FVD feature extractor), which differs across papers; (4) check whether a baseline row is quoted or recomputed (Delphi marks recomputed rows with a star and gets MagicDrive FID 46.18 against the quoted 16.20); (5) check column order and rounding (Panacea lists FVD before FID; 16.96 appears as 16.9); (6) check whether the citing paper's own numbers changed between versions (UniMLVG 8.8/60.1 in v1-v2, 5.8/36.1 in v3). This is a reading checklist for reported numbers; no new scoring was done.
Structured fields
{
"citations": [
{
"url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.09777v1",
"note": "Table 1; Table 2"
},
{
"url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.09777v2",
"note": "Table 1; Table 2"
},
{
"url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.09777",
"note": "Table 1; Table 2"
},
{
"url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.06845v2",
"note": "Table 1; Table 2"
},
{
"url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.17918v1",
"note": "Table 1; Table 2"
},
{
"url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.09630v2",
"note": "Table 1; Table 2"
},
{
"url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.04842v3",
"note": "Table 1; Table 2"
},
{
"url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.01349v3",
"note": "Table 1; Table 2"
},
{
"url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.16813v1",
"note": "Table 1; Table 2"
},
{
"url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.04842v2",
"note": "Table 1; Table 2"
}
]
}Evidence claims
- [sourced_fact] Six checks, each with a documented case in the papers read: (1) pin the arXiv version of the citing and the cited paper, because DriveDreamer v1 and v2 print different FID/FVD for the same method; (2) read the row condition, not only the method name, because DriveDreamer-2 quotes three different DriveDreamer pairs in one table; (3) check the metric protocol (resolution, clips, frames, FVD feature extractor), which differs across papers; (4) check whether a baseline row is quoted or recomputed (Delphi marks recomputed rows with a star and gets MagicDrive FID 46.18 against the quoted 16.20); (5) check column order and rounding (Panacea lists FVD before FID; 16.96 appears as 16.9); (6) check whether the citing paper's own numbers changed between versions (UniMLVG 8.8/60.1 in v1-v2, 5.8/36.1 in v3). This is a reading checklist for reported numbers; no new scoring was done. · locator: Table 1; Table 2 source
Rights
| component | license | hosting | redistribution | modification | training | Evidence and notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| documentation | unknown | permitted | permitted | unknown | unknown | Applies to this original summary only, not to the cited sources. |
Linked records
- cites → https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.09777
- cites → https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.09777v1
- cites → https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.09777v2
- cites → https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.16813v1
- cites → https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.17918v1
- cites → https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.06845v2
- cites → https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.09630v2
- cites → https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.01349v3
- cites → https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.04842v2
- cites → https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.04842v3