What do the public pages state for video generation price per second by resolution, audio and duration tier, across Google, Runway, Luma, fal, Replicate and Pika?

Dated 2026-10-22 captures: Gemini API Veo 3.1 Standard $0.40/s (720p and 1080p), $0.60/s 4k; Fast $0.10/$0.12/$0.30 per s at 720p/1080p/4k; Lite $0.05/$0.08 per s; Omni Flash about $0.10/s at 720p from a token rate. Runway API lists per-second credits (credit = $0.01) for many third-party models, e.g. veo3.1 with audio 40 credits/s and gen4.5 12 credits/s. Luma Ray3.2 lists per-clip prices at 540p/720p/1080p. fal lists Kling v3 Standard at $0.084/s audio off and $0.126/s audio on on the model page. Pika sells consumer credits. Resolution, audio, and duration tiers change the unit price; Veo 1080p and 4k are limited to 8 s. Curator correction 2026-10-24 (curator source re-verification record CUR-0618-01; sources re-fetched 2026-10-24, excerpts re-located by curator GET): The Gemini API Veo 3.1 Preview models (veo-3.1-generate-preview, veo-3.1-fast-generate-preview, veo-3.1-lite-generate-preview) were shut down on October 22, 2026, per the warning on the Gemini API Veo page (https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/veo.md.txt, curator GET 2026-10-24T03:16:31Z, sha256 6ddf6b9ca73d4cb3fb6bc28233b13a15e009ae645fc2023a2956856139ef6917). The Gemini API pricing page no longer lists any Veo price (https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing.md.txt, same time, sha256 d80f45c51ef14335bc31ade14fbc13a5a69beafa779fa70379f15c1bb9900f56, zero Veo mentions). The Veo 3.1 Standard, Fast and Lite per-second prices above were for those shut-down Gemini API preview models: keep them as history, not for new estimates. Google points users to gemini-omni-1.1-flash or GA Veo models on the Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform; GA Veo prices were not captured here. The Veo page's code samples still show veo-3.1-generate-preview. Curator qualifications: Verified the prices, the same-model/different-channel comparison and the Luma conflict (the block rule implies 2x; the table shows 3x). Curator-found same-page inconsistency: the Luma FAQ says 'V2V (Video-to-Video) generations are supported at 10, 15, or 20 seconds', while the Ray3.2 table prices 'V2V (5s) $0.72 $1.44 $2.16'. The FAQ may describe a different model scope; unresolved. Add the curator-found Luma V2V length inconsistency (FAQ 10/15/20 s vs table V2V 5s row). Evidence status: statements located in the cited sources by a correlated desk review (Claude); not executed; not independently reviewed.

{
  "citations": [
    {
      "url": "https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing.md.txt",
      "note": "Veo 3.1 table; Video Generation Pricing; Cost Breakdown Ray3.2; FAQ How is usage billed?"
    },
    {
      "url": "https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/veo.md.txt",
      "note": "Veo 3.1 table; Video Generation Pricing; Cost Breakdown Ray3.2; FAQ How is usage billed?"
    },
    {
      "url": "https://docs.dev.runwayml.com/guides/pricing/",
      "note": "Veo 3.1 table; Video Generation Pricing; Cost Breakdown Ray3.2; FAQ How is usage billed?"
    },
    {
      "url": "https://lumalabs.ai/api/pricing",
      "note": "Veo 3.1 table; Video Generation Pricing; Cost Breakdown Ray3.2; FAQ How is usage billed?"
    },
    {
      "url": "https://fal.ai/models/fal-ai/kling-video/v3/standard/text-to-video/llms.txt",
      "note": "Veo 3.1 table; Video Generation Pricing; Cost Breakdown Ray3.2; FAQ How is usage billed?"
    },
    {
      "url": "https://replicate.com/pricing",
      "note": "Veo 3.1 table; Video Generation Pricing; Cost Breakdown Ray3.2; FAQ How is usage billed?"
    },
    {
      "url": "https://pika.art/pricing",
      "note": "Veo 3.1 table; Video Generation Pricing; Cost Breakdown Ray3.2; FAQ How is usage billed?"
    }
  ]
}