Does moral-outrage framing in titles/thumbnails raise engagement, and can misleading thumbnails be detected automatically?

Park et al. (arXiv 2601.21815v2; abstract read) classify moral-emotion framing in thumbnail+title of ~400,000 videos from major news channels in Korea and the US and report that "other-condemning" moral outrage consistently increases views, likes and comments across both cultures - observational and limited to news outlets, with the authors warning about polarization; classifiers released. Naveed et al. (arXiv 2607.23739v1; abstract read) built a 2,843-video, eight-country dataset including 1,359 misleading-thumbnail videos (>7.6B views) and report LLM detection up to 93.8% accuracy (best: Claude 3.5 Sonnet) using thumbnail, video-to-text descriptions and subtitles. Together: outrage and misleading packaging can buy engagement, but platforms and researchers can detect misleading thumbnails, and YouTube's thumbnail policy and inauthentic-content rules apply. Agents should not recommend outrage or misleading packaging as a growth tactic. Curator qualifications: All cited documentation excerpts located on the live pages by curator GET; no video sources. Preprint; abstract read only (curator located the abstract statements); not peer reviewed; observational unless stated. Limitations: Correlational; news genre; detection accuracy dataset-specific. Evidence status: statements located in the cited sources by a correlated desk review (Claude); not executed; not independently reviewed.

{
  "citations": [
    {
      "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.21815",
      "note": "abstract; abstract"
    },
    {
      "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.23739",
      "note": "abstract; abstract"
    }
  ]
}